Pella vs. Jerash: Comparing Jordan's Archaeological Giants

February 25, 20238 min read
Split image showing ruins at Pella and Jerash

Two Archaeological Treasures: Pella and Jerash

Jordan is home to some of the world's most impressive archaeological sites, with Jerash and Pella standing out as two remarkable examples of ancient cities that have withstood the test of time. While Jerash enjoys international fame and draws large numbers of visitors, Pella remains relatively unknown to many travelers, despite its equally fascinating history and archaeological significance.

This comparison explores the unique characteristics, visitor experiences, and historical significance of both sites to help you understand their distinct appeal and perhaps decide which one to prioritize if your time in Jordan is limited.

Historical Overview: Different Timelines, Different Stories

Pella: A 10,000-Year Timeline

Pella (known locally as Tabaqat Fahl) boasts an extraordinarily long history of continuous human settlement spanning over 10,000 years. Archaeological evidence reveals:

  • Neolithic settlements dating back to 8000 BCE
  • Bronze Age city with Canaanite influences (3000-1200 BCE)
  • Iron Age occupation (1200-539 BCE)
  • Hellenistic city named after Alexander the Great's birthplace (332-63 BCE)
  • Roman provincial town (63 BCE-324 CE)
  • Byzantine Christian center with multiple churches (324-636 CE)
  • Early Islamic settlement (636 CE onwards)
  • Destruction by earthquake in 747 CE, after which the site never fully recovered

Jerash: The Roman Masterpiece

Jerash (ancient Gerasa) has a more concentrated historical timeline, with its golden age firmly in the Roman and Byzantine periods:

  • Bronze Age settlement evidence (limited)
  • Hellenistic foundation (332-63 BCE)
  • Major Roman expansion and development (63 BCE-324 CE)
  • Peak prosperity as part of the Decapolis league of cities
  • Byzantine Christian center (324-636 CE)
  • Early Islamic period (636 CE onwards)
  • Decline after the earthquake of 747 CE
  • Partial reoccupation during the Crusader period and Ottoman era

Key Difference: Historical Depth

While Jerash showcases spectacular Roman urban planning and architecture from a specific era, Pella offers a deeper chronological journey through multiple civilizations and historical periods. Pella is a site where you can literally see the layers of history stacked upon each other.

Archaeological Features: What You'll See

Pella's Archaeological Highlights

Pella's archaeological remains are more subtle and require some imagination to appreciate fully:

  • Bronze Age Temple: One of the oldest structures at the site, dating to around 1800 BCE
  • Civic Complex: Including a nymphaeum (public fountain), baths, and an odeon
  • Byzantine Churches: Three significant churches with some visible mosaics
  • Tell Husn: The high mound overlooking the main site with remains from multiple periods
  • Ongoing Excavations: Only about 5% of ancient Pella has been excavated, with new discoveries regularly emerging

Jerash's Monumental Roman City

Jerash offers some of the best-preserved and most complete Roman city ruins outside of Italy:

  • Oval Plaza: A distinctive forum surrounded by columns
  • Cardo Maximus: The main colonnaded street running the length of the city
  • Temples: Including the Temple of Artemis and the Temple of Zeus
  • Theaters: Two well-preserved Roman theaters
  • Nymphaeum: An ornate public fountain
  • Hippodrome: Where Roman chariot races and other events were held
  • Byzantine Churches: Several churches with mosaic floors
  • City Walls and Gates: Including the impressive Hadrian's Arch

Key Difference: Visual Impact

Jerash delivers immediate visual impact with its standing columns, intact theaters, and clear urban layout. Pella requires more interpretation and imagination but rewards visitors with a more intimate connection to layers of ancient history.

Visitor Experience: Crowds vs. Tranquility

The Pella Experience: Peaceful Exploration

Visiting Pella offers a markedly different experience from most major tourist sites in Jordan:

  • Few Visitors: Often, you might be among only a handful of tourists at the site
  • Peaceful Atmosphere: Allows for quiet contemplation and unhurried exploration
  • Personal Connection: Opportunity to discover the site at your own pace
  • Authentic Setting: The site feels less "prepared" for tourism, creating a more authentic archaeological experience
  • Local Interaction: More chances to interact with local staff and guides who often have deep knowledge of the site

The Jerash Experience: Spectacular but Busy

Jerash delivers a more conventional archaeological tourism experience:

  • Significant Crowds: Especially during peak season and when tour buses arrive
  • Organized Tourism: Well-established pathways, signage, and facilities
  • Regular Events: Including the RACE (Roman Army and Chariot Experience) show
  • Guided Tours: Many professional guides offering services
  • Souvenir Shops and Facilities: More developed tourist infrastructure

Key Difference: Tourism Development

Jerash is a fully developed tourist attraction with all the conveniences and crowds that entails. Pella offers a more off-the-beaten-path experience for travelers seeking tranquility and a sense of discovery.

Accessibility and Practical Considerations

Visiting Pella: Logistics

  • Location: Jordan Valley, about 130 km northwest of Amman
  • Access: Requires private transportation (rental car or taxi) as public transport options are limited
  • Entrance Fee: 3 JOD per person
  • Facilities: Basic restrooms and a small rest house
  • Time Needed: 2-3 hours to explore thoroughly
  • Terrain: Some uneven ground and optional uphill walking to Tell Husn
  • Climate: Very hot in summer due to its location in the Jordan Valley

Visiting Jerash: Logistics

  • Location: About 50 km north of Amman
  • Access: Easy to reach by public bus, taxi, or as part of organized tours
  • Entrance Fee: 10 JOD per person (included in Jordan Pass)
  • Facilities: Restrooms, restaurants, souvenir shops, visitor center
  • Time Needed: 3-4 hours to explore thoroughly
  • Terrain: Mostly flat with some gentle slopes, well-maintained pathways
  • Climate: More moderate than Pella due to higher elevation

Key Difference: Ease of Visit

Jerash is easier to access, offers more facilities, and requires less planning to visit. Pella demands more effort but rewards visitors with a more exclusive experience.

Photography Opportunities

Photographing Pella

Pella offers more subtle photographic opportunities:

  • Dramatic landscape shots with the Jordan Valley as backdrop
  • Intimate archaeological details
  • Layers of history visible in excavation trenches
  • Panoramic views from Tell Husn
  • Often no other tourists in your shots

Photographing Jerash

Jerash provides more classical archaeological photography:

  • Dramatic colonnaded streets and plazas
  • Well-preserved architectural details
  • Theatrical elements and grand temples
  • Opportunities for both wide-angle grandeur and detailed close-ups
  • Challenge of avoiding crowds in photos

Which Should You Visit?

Visit Pella If You:

  • Prefer off-the-beaten-path experiences
  • Enjoy peaceful archaeological sites without crowds
  • Are interested in multi-layered history spanning many civilizations
  • Appreciate subtle archaeological remains that require imagination
  • Want to see active archaeological excavations
  • Are planning to explore northern Jordan beyond the main tourist circuit

Visit Jerash If You:

  • Want to see one of the world's best-preserved Roman cities
  • Prefer sites with clear, visually impressive remains
  • Are particularly interested in Roman urban planning and architecture
  • Have limited time in Jordan and want to see a "must-visit" site
  • Prefer sites with developed facilities and services
  • Want an archaeological experience that requires less background knowledge to appreciate

Or Better Yet, Visit Both!

For the most complete understanding of Jordan's archaeological heritage, visiting both sites is ideal. They complement each other perfectly: Jerash showcases the monumental grandeur of Roman urban planning, while Pella offers a deeper dive into the layered history of the region across multiple civilizations.

If you have at least a week in Jordan, consider dedicating one day to Jerash and another to exploring Pella along with other sites in northern Jordan like Umm Qais or Ajloun Castle.

Conclusion: Two Faces of Jordan's Archaeological Heritage

Jerash and Pella represent two different but equally valuable aspects of Jordan's rich archaeological heritage. Jerash dazzles with its monumental Roman architecture and well-preserved urban layout, offering an accessible and visually spectacular experience. Pella, meanwhile, invites visitors to dig deeper, both literally and figuratively, into the layered history of the region across multiple civilizations.

Whether you're drawn to the grandeur of Jerash's colonnaded streets or the quiet contemplation of Pella's multi-layered tells, both sites offer invaluable windows into the ancient world that once flourished in what is now Jordan.